Why he made the error will be investigated and how it can be solved in the future will be suggested. With human factors being a big part of investigations today, if the controller did make an error, the investigation will not just stop there. An investigation will be made, and likely suggestions will be made to make it safer in the future. If there is an error made, it will be corrected. Even if the controller did not understand him, and even if he did not understand the controller, he is going to land his aircraft and get everyone safely out.ĪTC in the United States is totally transparent. As he was on an approach to a landing area, he is going to land. Regardless of what the controller said, a Captain commanding an aircraft with smoke in the cockpit is going to land ASAP, and likely going to evacuate the aircraft. While it would appear that the controller made an error here (pure conjecture at this point), it did not affect the outcome of the flight. In spite of what many on here think, the ATC system in the United States is among the finest in the world. Even if you're not using the correct callsign, he should have taken this seriously and most certainly not call it "BS".very unprofessional and dangerous. Kudos to the pilots for bringing down the plane safely and they should really look into this controller. They ideally have good training, but that doesn't prevent them from making mistakes and I'd rather have a pilot that lands a plane safely and uses a wrong callsign in such a situation, than a pilot that uses the right callsign but crashes on final, because he thought it was more important to concentrate on communication than on flying. They're no super heroes, they are people. ![]() Pilots are humans and humans act human (logically.). It's always easy to judge others in situations you have never been in from your armchair, is it? I didn't, and therefore I certainly don't have the right to judge the pilots. I wonder how many of the people on here judging the pilot have actually ever FLOWN a real plane from the flight deck or had to live through an emergency while on the flight deck. ![]() ![]() The signal PAN-PAN should be used in the same manner for an urgency condition. Distress and urgency communications procedures are prescribed by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), however, and have decided advantages over the informal procedure described above.ī. Distress and urgency communications procedures discussed in the following paragraphs relate to the use of air ground voice communications.Ĭ. The initial communication, and if considered necessary, any subsequent transmissions by an aircraft in distress should begin with the signal MAYDAY, preferably repeated three times. Quoting SLCGuy ( Reply 6): Declaring an emergency is accepted as much as a mayday call.įrom the FAA's Aeronautical Information Manual - Official Guide to Basic Flight Information and ATC Procedures Ħ-3-1. Distress and Urgency CommunicationsĪ. A pilot who encounters a distress or urgency condition can obtain assistance simply by contacting the air traffic facility or other agency in whose area of responsibility the aircraft is operating, stating the nature of the difficulty, pilot's intentions and assistance desired.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |